National Citizens Alliance is committed to informing Canadians about issues that concern all of us in today’s political landscape. We hope you enjoy the content and hope you find the information useful in understanding the challenges we face as a Nation.
It’s no secret that Canadians pay the highest cell phone bills in the developed world according to a report commissioned by the CRTC in 2016:
“The study, which was carried out by Nordicity Group for the telecom regulator, found that Canadians looking for 150 minutes of monthly mobile service paid more than consumers in every other G7 country and Australia.
That entry-level wireless package costs an average of $41.08 a month in Canada. By way of comparison, the cheapest price for that level of service cost just $17.15 in Germany.
… At each of four … levels of higher-service options, topping out at unlimited talk and text and 10 GB of data, Canadians were paying the second-highest price among the eight countries the study looked at. The U.K. was the cheapest.”
But we suspect that most Canadians have either forgotten, or simply didn’t know who was responsible.
It seems that in 2007, Maxime Bernier, as Minister of Industry in the Harper regime, decided to reform our telecommunications laws by overruling the plans of the CRTC to regulate the industry. He mandated that the commission “rely on market forces to the maximum extent feasible and to regulate telecommunications services only when necessary.”
Critics at the time remarked that “the emphasis on market forces has been so great that the Minister from the Beauce might be better characterized as the Minister from Bell.” (Source:https://www.thestar.com/business/2007/02/12/berniers_troubling_stand_on_net_neutrality.html)
The CRTC study that found that Bell, Rogers and Telus (the Big 3) had a 91 per cent collective oligopoly of all wireless service revenues in 2016. In a complete denial of facts, this study was criticized by the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI), a “pro-free-market think-tank” which argued against any government regulation of the wireless industry claiming that the market was competitive when it clearly was not. According to an MEI spokesperson, Canada’s telecom industry “has a regulation problem, not a pricing problem” despite the fact that it wasn’t being regulated at all.
With a budget of nearly $2.3 million annually, the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI) is a “non-profit research organization (or think tank) based in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. It aims at promoting economic liberalism through economic education of the general public and what it regards as efficient public policies in Quebec and Canada through studies and conferences,” according to its Wikipedia page.
It also happens that Maxime Bernier was an Executive Vice-President at MEI in 2005 before he became Canada’s Minister of Industry. MEI fully endorses Bernier’s often repeated attacks on the concept of supply management, claiming that it will ultimately benefit consumers.
Just like deregulating the wireless market did, Max?
The Montreal Economic Institute is a partner of The Atlas Network, a Globalist consortium of “think-tanks”. It has 13 such partners in Canada, many of which are astro-turfing as “grassroots”:
Another People’s Party of Canada lieutenant, Martin Masse, also worked at MEI and Bernier’s other lieutenant, Maxime Hupe, worked for the Fraser Institute. Both Atlas and Fraser have received large donations from the Koch brothers.
For those who are just getting their feet wet in the realm of political ideology, Bernier’s self-proclaimed “Libertarian” leanings are actually the exact opposite of Nationalism/Populism. While he claims to reject crony corporatism, he has a history of doing exactly the opposite: supporting Globalist corporate goals over the public interest at every turn.
The People’s Party of Canada is no party of the people unless you’re one of the people pulling the strings.
Statistics Canada just released the newest version of Police Reported Hate Crime in Canada on April 30th. We would like to highlight some facts that are not being reported in the mainstream media, which tends to showcase the views of and quotations from people who (as you will soon see) are making lucrative careers out of operating a growing number of “anti-hate” NGO’s in our country. They are being funded with our tax dollars in excess of $45 million.
“Despite the increase in ethnic diversity in Canada, hate crimes account for a very small proportion of all crime reported by police each year, making up 0.1% of all police-reported crimes” says the report. That is a tenth of one-percent of a reported 1.9 million crimes.
Notwithstanding, Canada’s Dept. of Public Safety issued this press release on March 16th: “The University of Ontario Institute of Technology will receive $366,985 over three years from the Government of Canada to examine the right-wing extremism movement through interviews with law enforcement, community anti-hate activists, and former and current extremists. The University will also partner with the Institute for Strategic Dialogue in London, U.K., to conduct innovative analysis of online content and media coverage, designed to inform local responses to hate speech and hate crime.” The person who appears to be controlling these funds is one Dr. Barbara Perry, Professor, Faculty of Social Science and Humanities.
This University of Ontario rated a low 9th overall in Maclean’s Magazine’s annual evaluation of Canadian educational institutions, however we uncovered that the curriculum offers “Building Sustainable Communities: Explores current social and economic needs while ensuring future generations have adequate resources; emphasizes creation of sustainable local development and considers alternative approaches to community development and asset management.” Right out of the UN Agenda 2030 playbook.
Last year, another group, the Organization for the Prevention of Violence received a $1.29 million grant from the federal government for a three-year study as part of its national plan to counter hate and violent extremism in Alberta. This is interesting considering the latest report shows that the incidence of hate crimes is higher in Ontario and Quebec…
“The OPV, in cooperation with the Canadian Network for Research on Terrorism, Security and Society, the Canadian Practitioners’ Network and the Students’ Commission is pleased to host Partnering in Practice: Preventing Social Polarization in Edmonton from November 30th to December 3rd, 2018. This conference is generously supported by UNESCO” (that the federal government, irrespective of which mainstream party is in power, has been funding up to $10 million a year).
In 2017 Public Safety Canada advised that it was creating a new Centre for Community Engagement and Prevention of Violence with these highlights:
*Budget 2016 provided $35 million over five years and $10 million annually thereafter to combat radicalization to violence in Canada;
*The July 6, 2017 call for proposals for the Community Resilience Fund (CRF) will have $1.4 million available to fund projects in 2018-19. For 2019-20 and beyond, the CRF will have $7 million available each year for existing and new projects.
*An initial 10 projects of organizations with work underway on countering radicalization have already been funded through a directed call.”
Interestingly, that “10 projects” link says that page is “unavailable”…
One of the more visible groups that has sprung up in recent times is the rather rabid “Anti-Hate Network”, which slandered the law firm of Gardiner, Roberts LLP by claiming that they were advocating “ethnic cleansing” in Canada. (Source:https://www.thepostmillennial.com/canadian-anti-hate-network-accuses-law-firm-of-promoting-ethnic-cleansing-while-hiding-its-own-ideological-bias/)
We agree with the author of that article that “The supposed anti-hate organization seems to be more interested in bullying people for political wrong-think than fighting any form of real hatred in Canada.”
The same day the above-referenced report on hate crimes was released, the Anti-Hate group appeared to be upset that the results weren’t more inflated!
What appears to be entirely missing from these statistics are the number of crimes committed by visible minorities against other visible minorities as it appears there is a presumption that all hate crimes are committed by the Canadian Euro-Canadian heritage majority. In the meantime, other data from the report indicates that hate crimes against “whites” have also nearly doubled, but that’s buried in a table near the bottom. You might suspect a double standard at play when police forces are prohibited from keeping statistics on crimes committed by visible minorities but are required to keep records of crimes committed against visible minorities.
What should be particularly concerning to Canadians is that the concept of “far-right extremism” is being piggybacked as the major cause of hate crimes when this has not been shown to be the case: it’s a supposition by those who have the most to gain financially by showcasing this theory whenever possible in the mainstream media to justify their group’s existence.
In 2014, CSIS declared on its website that right-wing extremism was not a significant problem in Canada. In 2018 a CSIS internal review found that the majority of right-wing extremism activities consisted of or were “near to,” lawful protest, advocacy, and dissent. It determined that the current threat environment no longer met its criteria for investigation. CSIS also determined that the public order threat as opposed to a national security threat could be appropriately addressed by local law enforcement. (Source: http://www.sirc-csars.gc.ca/pdfs/ar_2017-2018-eng.pdf)
We have to be leery of groups promoting the theory that their subjective interpretations of potential effects should be paramount over a demonstrable level of harm or even the intention of the accused.
There is a longstanding principle of law, mens rea which according to the Legal Dictionary means ” Guilty knowledge and wilfulness. A fundamental principle of Criminal Law is that a crime consists of both a mental and a physical element. Mens rea, a person’s awareness of the fact that his or her conduct is criminal, is the mental element, and actus reus, the act itself, is the physical element.”
We agree with the author of the Post-Millenial article referenced above “In my view, the Canadian Anti-Hate Network represents the worst of modern politics. A group of like-minded opportunists and ideologues who mask their political goals and ambitions as neutral “social justice”.
Even those who are not fans of certain social media personalities should find it reprehensible that people like Evan Balgord of this anti-hate group should be wallowing in childish glee with boasts like this on Twitter:
So, who is Evan Balgord? His bio states “Balgord earned his Honours Bachelor of Science at the University of Toronto with a double major in Psychology and Sociology. Following that, he completed the Munk School of Global Affairs Fellowship in Global Journalism.” In short, he’s a Globalist shill. TSAS receives funding from Public Safety Canada.
What should concern us even more is that this group “is modeled after, and supported by, the Southern Poverty Law Center in the United States,” which has quite frankly been outed as a fraud. According to several articles researched, this one sums it up best as “A big money-making smear machine” “that uses its list of designated hate groups in much the same way: to manipulate the lives of others, smear reputations, control personal relationships, and reap the spoils. (Source: https://thefederalist.com/2017/05/17/12-ways-southern-poverty-law-center-scam-profit-hate-mongering/)
Canadians should be concerned that a small group of taxpayer subsidized vocal activists who are working to enforce Globalist goals of open borders, the erasure of Canadian sovereignty and the censorship of open debate/criticism of government policy are also being quoted as authorities in the mainstream media. We are at a point where these people have been given carte blanche to label anyone who criticizes immigration numbers, or who talks about Canadian identity and heritage a “far-right extremist”.
National Citizens Alliance believes that the $45 million+ currently being spent on these so-called anti-hate groups would be better invested with Canadian homeless, veterans, seniors and low income earner programs.
|Sikhs do not like to see proud Whites in their 81% ethnic stronghold in Calgary|
The urgency facing European Canadians is more severe than I imagined.
On Friday, March 15, 2019, I published a live video of an ethnic enclave in Calgary on the National Citizens Alliance’s (NCA) Facebook page. This particular ethnic enclave with an 81% visible minority population mirrors almost exactly the demographic reality that Dr. Duchesne and Dr. Kaufmann have been warning about: sustained mass immigration of 200,000 plus since the 1990s is causing the replacement of Canada’s traditional Euro heritage population with third world immigrants. As Dr. Duchesne and Dr. Kaufmann state, if this is allowed to continue unabated, by 2100 visible ethnic minorities similar to this Calgary enclave will become an 80% super majority population, while Canada’s traditional Euro heritage population will be relegated to a 20% minority.
This transformation represents a radical change in the demographic make-up of Canada. According to Dr. Duchesne from his book Canada in Decay (2017), the transformation is unprecedented in world history in that consecutive Canadian federal governments are actually replacing the people they are supposed to serve. In addition, according to Dr. Kaufmann, Canada is undergoing the fastest ethnic change in the Western world.
Through the NCA ethnic enclave video, I was given a rare glimpse into what Canada would look like if this radical demographic transformation occurs. It will not be a hospitable country if you are a European Canadian. You should be alarmed at what may be coming. In my opinion, Canada is heading down a similar path to South Africa, where the Boers are presently being persecuted, robbed, tortured, and murdered with the tacit consent of the SA government and opposition parties under the guise of righting past social wrongs.
It should be noted that according to Dr. Kaufmann, four out of five immigrants coming into Canada are from the third world. Further, it doesn’t matter which establishment party or controlled opposition is in power federally. All these parties support mass immigration of at least 250,000 a year not including illegal migration and chain migration. Case in point, the Stephen Harper regime, which pretended to be nationalist and supportive of old stock Canadians, had historic mass immigration (highest levels in 100 years) from 190 countries with the Philippines, India, China, Islamic Republic of Iran, and Pakistan in the top five of immigrant home countries. In comparison, the Justin Trudeau regime has had historic mass immigration (slightly higher than the Harper regime) from 190 countries with the Philippines, India, Syria, China, and Pakistan in the top five of immigrant home countries.
The NCA ethnic enclave video has received over eleven hundred comments, and many of these comments are by third world immigrants from the enclave or connected to it. Their hostility towards European Canadians is undeniable. It should be acknowledged that most of these immigrants come from utterly ruthless, corrupt countries, where individual and group self-preservation are at the forefront of daily life. Here are some representative comments (profanity and threats have been edited out):
Non-White Immigrants Despise Whites Who Show Pride and Dignity
- “Go back to Europe. This is Native land. Canada is not belong to you and build by immigrants.”
- “I am in no way benefiting from the work done by Europeans. Rather, people like me have to help deconstruct all the narratives of white supremacy.”
- “Immigrants [European Canadians] are those arrived on Indigenous land, and exploited labour and resources, and ethnically cleansed populations.”
- “Immigrants work harder for their livelihood [than European Canadians]. Most of them don’t waster their earnings on bars, pubs, and casinos.”
- “You are so privileged as a white individual.”
- “Canada’s traditional population was native American maybe you racist mother (profanity) should fact check.”
- “If immigrants leave Canada and you are asked to work in their places, you will not survive. Canada is a country built by immigrants and you have to know that before pushing forward a racist agenda.”
- “Why did you feel the need to emphasize that European Canadians are a part of Canada’s traditional population? Settler colonialist ideologies rest on racist beliefs while perpetuating a belief that Europeans discovered Canada. It’s racist because you’re literally disregarding the fact that Canada runs largely due to immigration and the innovation and labour they bring with them, not from the mass methods of social control and ethnic cleansing you’re trying to portray as normal.”
- “Traditional population would not at all refer to European Canadians! Europeans were the ones who colonized Canada and took over the homes of many Native Americans!!!”
- “Why care about Canada’s demographic reality? Just embrace it. It was a white male that slaughtered 49 people in NZ should we ban all white people? No thats absurd. Who are you to strike a discussion on what Canada demographic realities should be. This platform you’ve chosen is wrong and implies hateful rhetoric.”
- “All your forefathers did was steal land from natives, and i aint no (profanity) guest, im a Canadian citizen.”
|Today, in 2019, it is far worse: Canadian cities are becoming massive Ethnic Enclaves where Whites are hated.|
- “My grandparents were born here…My grandfather fought in World War 2 to keep this a free country…They fought for us NOT YOU!!. The Europeans built this country and made it the envy of the world…” Response: “I am afraid the school system has failed you you racist ignorant stupid idiot maybe you should educate yourself because you are a cancer to society.”
- “Not about race at all right when you echo the same sentiments that terrorist who murdered 50 people at the NZ mosques did? Looks like you have borrowed several pages from his manifesto. You need to be on a watchlist.”
- “You are talking about a conspiracy theory of demographic change with brown people taking over. Maybe you should talk about the continuing genocide of indigenous people on this land. You are just spewing white nationalist vitriol…”
- “We do not believe extreme multiculturalism is conducive to national unity…. nor do we believe the expansion of ethnic enclaves is good for Canada because they encourage division, non-integration, and extremism….” Response: “What his guy is spewing amounts to cultural cleansing. But what you have is a bunch of immigrants [Europeans] who took up residence in a land staked a claim on it and called it theirs when it was already inhibited by indigenous people. And now don’t want any others to come in, because they are afraid of what their ancestor did may get done to them. I don’t blame you, I’d be afraid of karma too.”
- “I wish you would say this to my face whiteboy.” (in response to the video.)
- “You all are a bunch of racist (profanity) this country would be nothing without immigrants let’s not forget Canada does not belong to white people and it never did.”
The comments are evidence of the dark reality not far off in the horizon for European Canadians, First Nations, Inuit, and Metis, if this radical replacement is not stopped.
Speaking About Population Replacement of Whites = Terrorism
As if the sentiment in these comments weren’t enough, the media on a daily basis fuels third world immigrant populism and the growing divide between Euro-Canadians and third world immigrants. As an example, in a 2 ½ minute news video CityTV makes a false equivalency between the NCA ethnic enclave video and the recent New Zealand mass murder by pointing out that the “disturbing” notion of population replacement is mentioned in both cases. CityTV further tries to falsely tie white nationalism and far-right extremism to NCA’s video with the result that only more division and fear are created, despite the fact that the NCA video doesn’t contain a single derogatory comment towards visible minorities.
Further still, on March 21, 2019, the federal government announced that it is expediting legislation to remove “hateful and extremist” online content and “toxic communication” that “incites violence” and harms “social cohesion” including assertions to “replace” and “subjugate white people.” Also, the government encourages all social media companies to censor anyone or any group that mentions population replacement. In the words of Public Safety Minister, Ralph Goodale: “This has been a subject of discussion among ministers at the Five Eyes meetings and at the G7 meetings where ample discussion has been held on how we encourage the social media platforms to move quickly and efficiently to deal with toxic communications like this [assertions to “replace” and “subjugate white people”] that incite violence and hatred and obviously do great damage to social cohesion.” Again, there is a false equivalency being drawn between established facts on demographics/population replacement and the recent New Zealand mass murder.
Welcome to Canada’s growing censorial Orwellian dictatorship.
I hope this information will be a wakeup call to all Canadians in regard to the dire threat that looms in our future. The National Citizens Alliance of Canada supports a national dialogue on Canada’s demographic reality and immigration policies. We do not believe that Canada and its future should be dictated by the establishment and its multi-controlled opposition.
National Citizens Alliance is the only federal party running in 2019 that supports an end to mass immigration by reducing immigration to 50,000 or less in total per year, and a stop to the replacement agenda. NCA’s success can only be derived from the support of the Canadian people. Please heed our warning and join our efforts. The future of our children and their children are literally in the balance.
|Will we allow Canada’s beautiful landmass to be taken over by Asians?|
In the preface of Canada in Decay, Dr. Ricardo Duchesne sets out the urgency:
Through sustained mass immigration since the 1990’s regardless of which controlled opposition party is in power, Canada demographically is on a trajectory of replacing its traditional European population. In less than eighty years from now and under sustained mass immigration, Canada’s traditional population will be relegated to a minority of 20 percent or less of Canada’s total population. In short, Canada’s sustained, annual mass immigration of 200,000 plus a year is literally replacing the traditional population in an organized, planned manner from above. As Dr. Duchesne states, this radical immigration replacement policy is unprecedented in world history. This is the first urgency.
The second urgency is the fact that the Canadian people since at least the mid-1960 have been subjected to federal government legislation and policy against their own interests as individuals and as a people. Examples of this barrage: Pierre Trudeau declaring Canada a multicultural state despite opposition from the majority of Canadians, the imposition of the Charter and its multicultural heritage agenda, Mulroney implementing sustained mass immigration of 250,000 plus, affirmative action legislation to the detriment of traditional Canadians, the Canadian Multicultural Act, and signing Canada onto UN Agenda 21. Successive governments continued this globalist agenda, including Harper who brought historic mass immigration of 282,000 on average a year and who signed Canada onto UN Agenda 2030. Justin Trudeau has now added to Harper’s historic mass immigration record and brought in Bill M-103, declaring Canada a post national state.
Within the backdrop of this globalist agenda, there is a steady decimation of European Canadians through the implementation of affirmative action legislation, a decline in its population and condemnation of Canadian European history. In addition, there has been an attack on Christian values. Most importantly, any resistance is met with political correctness and identity politics with false calls of bigotry, racism, and hate. Further still, the mainstream media for decades has implemented neuro linguistic programming and mind control of the Canadian people and either ignores or vilifies all uncontrolled opposition to the globalist status quo agenda. In short, European Canadians have been beaten down while at the same time subjected to deception and control through indoctrination and fear of being labelled. Added to this suppression, controlled opposition in Ottawa has so far effectively eliminated any opposition to the globalist agenda.
We have reached the point that many European Canadians have become deluded, negative, doubtful, defeated while their own demise is right before their very eyes. Some of them scoff at any notion of change. Others are played back and forth through the false left/right, liberal/conservative control dichotomies, and settle for the false notion of the “lesser of two evils” without realizing they are bowing to controlled opposition. They do not realize that they are acquiescing to sustained mass immigration, thereby paradoxically contributing to their own demise.
I have taken to heart Dr. Duchesne’s urgency, dedicating my life to opposing the globalist forces that seek to radically transform our people and country. Through the National Citizens Alliance of Canada (NCA) I and other true patriots have created a true grassroots, uncontrolled federal opposition. With the support of a growing number of Canadians, we will reverse the wrongdoing being inflicted on our people and country. We reject all the norms of control. We are unconventional and committed to ending mass immigration by reducing it to 50,000 or less in total per year. We can and must do this, and with a growing number of Canadians we will do this.
Will you be a victim or an instigator for change?
Will you sit in silence or will you fight?
Will you JOIN NCA today, and JOIN our necessary struggle for our people, country, our children, their children?
Just as Canadian Maurice Strong was instrumental in the formation of the United Nations in conjunction with the Rockefeller Council on Foreign Relations/Trilateral Commission in the U.S., Canadian mainstream politicians were pioneers in the creation of worldwide Globalism.
If you still think that there is any truth to the notion that Canada’s mainstream political parties are actually in opposition to one another you really need to dive deeper into Canadian political history and connect the dots.
Canada’s foray into Globalism commenced in 1955 at a United Nations meeting with Paul Martin, Sr., the head of Canada’s delegation. Martin was determined to convince the UN that it needed to expand in an effort to exert more control over world finance. And young Paul Jr. was there in the cheering section.
Almost 40 years later, Canada’s then Minister of Finance Paul Martin Jr. (elected as a Liberal Member of Parliament in 1988, served as Minister of Finance (1993–2002) under Prime Minister Jean Chrétien, succeeded Chrétien as Prime Minister and Liberal Party leader in 2003, but resigned in 2006 after losing the federal election to Stephen Harper’s Conservative Party) created the G20 which included Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States, which represent about two-thirds of the world’s population and account for 85 percent of global GDP. The G20 is affiliated with the G7, World Trade Organization and (of course!) the United Nations.
“The G7 and the G20 were created when the world recognized globalization as a fact of life and essentially said, what we’ve got to do is to make it work for everyone,” Martin said in an interview with CIGI, “The Centre for International Governance Innovation” in November 2018.
It’s quite obvious that Martin’s “world” does not include the people of Canada, who were never consulted, neither does it include the populations of the other countries involved in this financial/trade collusion that has seen growing amounts of wealth accruing in the pockets of fewer and fewer people: “‘An Economy for the 99 percent’ reveals how big business and the super-rich are fuelling the inequality crisis. It shows how, in order to maximize returns to their wealthy shareholders, big corporations are dodging taxes, driving down wages for their workers and the prices paid to producers, and investing less in their business.” (Source: https://www.oxfam.org/en/pressroom/pressreleases/2017-01-16/just-8-men-own-same-wealth-half-world)
The notion that Globalization should work “for everyone” has a very short list of who that actually is. And who amongst us remembers electing anyone to a body that purports to be running an organization for “International Governance”, let alone the United Nations?
Critics of Globalism have consistently warned that it increasingly shifts the tax burden from Corporations onto individuals while increasing unemployment and decreasing wages.
With Globalization, goods can often be obtained cheaply from elsewhere (think China) making local industries not only uncompetitive but dependant. However if a major supply problem or financial crisis occurs, it will have a domino effect on every other jurisdiction in the global chain.
This cannot happen to countries that are independent and self-sufficient.
The following video shows Paul Martin Jr. and his then U.S. counterpart congratulating themselves on their Globalist achievements.All one needs to do is look up the current rogue’s gallery of Globalists on the Canadian Privy Council to find that Paul Martin Jr. and Stephen Harper are still very much involved in catering to Globalist trade deals such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (T.P.P.)at the present time. The above clip is from November 2018.
In the meantime, the mainstream media has been doing an even poorer job of exposing the foibles of the Globalist agenda or how it is rampant in both Liberal and Conservative mainstream political parties. It also seems to repeatedly miss the fact that there is no longer any real Opposition between these Globalist parties and they are working together to further the UN Agendas. The notion that there is any difference between them is nothing but political theatre.
And those same mainstream parties and their controlled media are being very careful to avoid talking about how Globalism is responsible for the growing wave of Populism/Nationalism as a logical backlash against it.
One of the articles referenced here is “Can the G20 Save Globalism’s Waning Reputation?” (https://www.cigionline.org/articles/can-g20-save-globalizations-waning-reputation) in which Martin is worried the G20 is now “meet(ing) in the shadow of rising populist sentiment, an unpredictable US president, tariff wars and technological disruption.”
What’s “unpredictable” about Donald Trump is that he is certainly no Globalist after refusing to go along with the Paris Climate Agreement, the UN Migration Compact, UN Agenda 21 or 2030 or the T.P.P.
In the meantime most of Europe is awash in Populist movements that are rejecting the EU and its Globalist reach.
The Canadian status quo is going out of its way to attempt to discredit or censor any political movement that is truly Populist/Nationalist in nature. That is why it is vitally important for Canadians to support National Citizens Alliance as the ONLY uncontrolled opposition to the UN/Globalist Agenda in Canada. Do not be fooled by the pretenses of established political parties or career politicians that they represent Canadians at a grassroots level: they’re astroturfers trying to distract you from the real deal.
Faith Goldy with Andrew Scheer (above) and with Ontario Premier Doug Ford (below).
The recent Facebook deplatforming of political commentator Faith J. Goldy naturally sent her and a number of her followers into a Twitter flurry of Liberal Party media censorship denunciations, all of course to be anticipated in view of the multi-million dollar buyout of the mainstream media, not to mention Justin Trudeau’s courting of Facebook and its new Montreal-based HQ for AI development.
Most people will be familiar with Goldy’s recently failed Toronto mayoralty campaign amid media accusations of her being a “white supremacist” after having conducted what her then-employer, The Rebel Media claimed were “unauthorized” interviews with “far-right” activists she called “patriots” during the Charlottesville “Unite the Right” demonstrations.
While anyone with a modicum of political awareness will agree that the Cultural Marxist slant of our current government’s policies and its bought mainstream media is virtually impossible to ignore, it’s time to start thinking more analytically about the less obvious gamesmanship that is occurring.
At face value — and who can dispute her very “in-your-face-with-my-face” Goldy video style — Faith Goldy has become very adept at convincing viewers that she is some avant-garde champion of Euro-Canadians (we run-of-the-mill white Canadian folks) and even interviewed Dr. Duchesne on February 18th of this year regarding his 2017 study Canada in Decay. The question I’d like to ask is What took you so long?
This was followed on March 30, 2019 with a 4.5 minute video entitled Race Against Time mirroring a very well researched article by National Citizens Alliance Leader Stephen J. Garvey that was published on the Council of European Canadian’s Blog on March 25, 2019 entitled It Will be Illegal to Talk About the Great Replacement of White Canadians.
Coincidental? I don’t think so, but you can judge for yourself.
It appears Ms. Goldy also wrote a post for the Council of European Canadians in November 2018 about the deservedly maligned UN Migration Compact. However awful that agreement is, it’s a soft target when compared to UN Agenda 21 (which gave rise to the “climate change” narrative that underwrites the rationale for the carbon tax) signed by Conservative PM Brian Mulroney in 1992, and UN Agenda 2030 which provides for the takeover of Canada by a UN Parliamentary Assembly (UNPA) signed by Conservative PM Stephen Harper in 2015.
The Rebel Media was founded in 2015 by former (Conservative) Sun News Media employees Ezra Levant and Brian Lilley. On its Board was one Hamish Marshall, who is currently Conservative Opposition Leader Andrew Scheer’s Campaign Manager. (Source: https://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/scheers-campaign-manager-on-ending-his-rebel-ties/)
Marshall “has an MBA from Oxford, and describes himself as a “strategist, pollster and demographic expert.” He once managed strategic planning for former prime minister Stephen Harper, and served as Harper’s pollster for the Tories’ winning 2008 federal campaign.” The article also reveals that Marshall worked for Brian Jean in 2017, once leader of Alberta’s Wildrose Party, in his bid for leadership of the United Conservative Party (UCP). Marshall is typified as an expert in “the highly technical art of collecting and exploiting data on supporters and voters”.
Andrew Scheer is quoted “And Hamish and I ended up lining up the same on a lot of issues, and strategically on how to present ourselves.”
The same article fails to mention Faith Goldy by name (a deliberate omission?) as The Rebel reporter who was ceremoniously fired for her comments during her coverage of the highly publicized Charlottesville incident that was instrumental in propelling her to social media prominence for the first time in her “career”.
You may note a similarity in the way Jordan Peterson gained media notoriety…
There is a common thread joining Hamish Marshall, Ezra Levant, Andrew Scheer and Faith Goldy and it’s rooted in the Shakespearean adage: Methinks the lady doth protest too much! Despite their obvious Conservative roots and common interactions, they have all engaged in highly publicized spectacles of denunciations of one another. Marshall claims he severed ties with Levant and The Rebel, Levant publicly fires Goldy from The Rebel (while claiming she was his fave reporter), Goldy denounces Levant and The Rebel, Scheer claims he won’t allow The Rebel to interview him any longer despite a previously warm relationship with Goldy (who has also posed in photo ops with Ontario Premier Doug Ford).
Never fear however, the false Left vs. Right narrative duly kicks in with the “how come you’re not denouncing…?” narrative from the Globalist Liberal Party.
Not long after Faith Goldy’s Facebook account was cancelled, the following appeared on the Liberal Party website:
OTTAWA, ON – Just minutes after Faith Goldy was banned by Facebook and Instagram for “spreading hate,” Faith Goldy urgently went online to encourage supporters to “go run sign up for your EDAs go make sure that our guys win within your various ridings.” (https://youtu.be/Kv7c73xN_7s?t=2706, Faith Goldy, YouTube, April 8, 2019)
EDAs (Electoral District Associations) are the local associations of members of a political party.
“Faith Goldy has been a long-time booster of Andrew Scheer, so it’s deeply troubling that after getting banned by Facebook, she is encouraging her supporters to infiltrate a political Party,” said Omar Alghabra, Liberal MP for Mississauga Centre. “I’m calling on Andrew Scheer to clearly state that he won’t tolerate anyone like Faith Goldy, or those who spread hate, in the Conservative Party.
“Canadians applauded Facebook’s decision to ban hate promoters. It’s high time thatAndrew Scheer followed their example and addressed the lingering questions around his tolerance for such groups and individuals. Mr. Scheer needs to disavow and denounce Ms. Goldy and white supremacist groups without equivocation,” said Alghabra, while pointing to the numerous connections between Andrew Scheer and Faith Goldy. Scheer and Faith Goldy spoke at the same rally on Parliament Hill in February (https://leaderpost.com/news/national/faith-goldy-five-others-banned-from-facebook-instagram-over-hate/wcm/94053542-fd47-40af-9fe5-ee287e57450b)Faith Goldy attended and endorsed Scheer at his Leadership convention:”Andrew Scheer is a 38 year old man. He’s younger, he’s hipper, he’s fresher than the Prime Minister that we now have. And frankly, he’s much more authentic. And if the mainstream media has a problem with the so-con wing of the party, tough luck guys!” (https://youtu.be/1bmrhFHT3kM?t=142) Scheer appeared on Faith Goldy’s YouTube channel when he was running for Conservative Leader, and promised to go duck hunting with her (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-JVPbMj_V4)Scheer’s Campaign Manager co-founded Rebel Media, which employed Faith Goldy.
“If Andrew Scheer doesn’t clearly disavow and denounce Faith Goldy, we can only assume he’s accepting her support for the Conservative Party.”
Diversion is our greatest strength?
This isn’t about “infiltration” because the connections have already been established. But for the record, the EDA’s referred to could just as likely belong to Bernier’s PPC which has also posed as being “populist” despite its easily proven Globalist bent. (See NCA blog post https://blog.nationalcitizensalliance.ca/?p=31).
But it appears that the Liberals are also playing the game in attempting to falsely portray the Conservative party as having populist policies and support!
This very interesting video was published in January in which Faith Goldy is shown advocating for a CPC and PPC merger into a United Conservative Party!
Given the obvious and explosive growth of Populism/Nationalism in Europe, it’s of significant consequence to the Globalist status quo in North America that Populism be diverted at all costs. Hence the creation of the PPC, which is foundering, and the attempt to portray the CPC as such.
The real goal of all of this political theatre is to circumvent the success of any real Canadian Populist/Nationalist Party in getting a foothold.
Another telling example of this was a Rebel Media reporter refusing to cover the huge anti-UN Global World Order Rally that NCA Leader Stephen Garvey conducted at Winston Churchill Square in Edmonton on December 5, 2018.
Who are the real rebels here?
In the meantime Scheer and the Conservatives support Cultural Marxist doctrines like multiculturalism, mass immigration, and support Islamic radical organizations such as the National Council of Canadian Muslims (NCCM) despite Scheer’s pretence of opposing the UN Migration Compact. In the meantime neither the CPC nor PPC have any intention of mentioning UN Agendas 21 or 2030, let alone withdrawing from them. That is not part of the Globalist plan.
Canadian Maurice Strong began working for the United Nations in 1947 where he became a cohort of the uber wealthy and influential Rockefellers and Rothschilds. A self-professed “socialist in ideology but a capitalist in methodology” he organized the first UN Earth Summit, The Stockholm Conference in 1972 after being appointed as the head of the United Nations Environmental Panel (UNEP).
UNEP lead to the formation of more UN organizations: The Earth Council, Earth Charter, World Resources Institute, World Wildlife Fund (later headed by Gerald Butts), and the Commission for World Governance.
The Commission for World Governance was created by Strong who envisioned funding via a world-wide income tax on all monetary transactions of 0.5% which would have given the UN an annual income of $1.5 trillion (the equivalent of the entire U.S. GDP at the time!).
Strong’s plan was vetoed by the UN Security Council. Believe it or not, Strong actually tried to get rid of the Security Council, but when that failed he was forced to come up with a new strategy that would generate the financing for his UN Global Governance plan.
In 1989 Strong was appointed Secretary General of the Earth Summit. The 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, gave birth to UN Agenda 21 along with the World Conservation Bank owned by the Rockefellers and Rothschilds. It was there that he announced: “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class — involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and work place air conditioning and suburban housing are not sustainable.”
Then PM Brian Mulroney signed Canada on to the UN Agenda 21 deal.
Keep this statement in mind when you peruse the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) because for all their environmental and humanitarian lingo, the reality check is that private property will be abolished, you will no longer be permitted to drive your own motor vehicle, energy will be rationed and there is a great likelihood you will not be permitted to have air conditioning or use a washing machine. We can probably figure on strict food control and rationing as well. This, of course, will not apply to the controlling class, the “small group of world leaders” who will continue to live their lavish lifestyles behind gated estates guarded by private security.
The UN World Conservation Bank controls the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (UN IPCC).
UN Agenda 21 was hailed as the comprehensive blueprint for the reorganization of human society using environmental protection to induce Western societies to voluntarily surrender their current rights and freedoms on a mostly emotional appeal of “saving the environment”.
Paul Watson of Greenpeace declared “It doesn’t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true.”
In 2000 the UN held the Millennium Summit, launching the Millennium Project featuring 8 goals for global sustainability to be reached by 2015. When that failed to happen the UN held another summit in New York City in September of 2015, now outlining 17 goals to be reached by 2030.
PM Stephen Harper signed Canada on to UN Agenda 2030.
The original idea for the climate deception came from a theory first put forward in 1896 that had already been disproved and rejected by mainstream science in the 1950’s when Britain’s world-leading expert, C.E.P. Brooks and the American Meteorological Society declared that carbon dioxide can have no measurable impact on Earth’s climate (Brooks, C.E.P., 1951. “Geological and Historical Aspects of Climate Change”.)
In 1998 Maurice Strong hired a computer modeller, Michael Mann from Penn State University to create a graph purporting to show climate statistics for the past 1,000 years. This became a highly publicized image featured in the UN’s Third Assessment Report (2001). It showed what came to be called the “hockey stick” graph (a flat “handle” for the first 900 years, then a sharp incline at the end depicting monumental increases for the modern era). Mann’s graph flattened nine centuries of data by excluding the Medieval Warm Period and a later Little Ice Age.
A Little Ice Age occurred from 1645 to 1715. At that time there was a period of low solar activity, the “Maunder Minimum”. Mann solved this really inconvenient truth by making it disappear. His graph is being used by the UN IPCC to claim that a catastrophic planetary disaster will occur if carbon dioxide emissions — a trace gas crucial to plant life, but now portrayed as poison — were not curtailed through draconian cuts to business, farming, transportation and energy use in Western nations.
Maurice Strong cleverly put forth the notion of imposing a Carbon Tax to penalize the entire planet for its nasty “carbon emissions” hoping that the majority of people wouldn’t clue in to the fact that the supposed culprit is an inert trace gas that comprises less than 1% of the air we breathe.
The UN IPCC wasn’t prepared for the rebuttal of their sketchy “science” by retired University of Winnipeg Climatology Professor Dr. Tim Ball, who in 2011, declared that “Michael Mann belongs in the State Pen. not Penn. State!”
Based on unadulterated data, you can see the difference between Mann’s falsified data, and the true data shown by Prof. Ball:
Professor Ball then found himself being sued in a B.C. Court for alleged “defamation” by Michael Mann.
As the case unfolded, the B.C. Supreme Court directed Mann to turn over all the data he used to create his hockey stick graph by Feb. 20, 2017. He has yet to do so, putting himself in contempt of court. As Tim Ball explains:
“We believe that he (Mann) withheld on the basis of a US court ruling that it was all his intellectual property. This ruling was made despite the fact that the US taxpayer paid for the research and the research results were used as the basis of literally earth-shattering policies on energy and environment. The problem for him is that the Canadian court holds that you cannot withhold documents that are central to your charge of defamation regardless of the US ruling.”
Mann is in contempt of court, however the case has still not been concluded. It’s very likely that he and his multi-millionaire UN cohorts will face losing the court case rather than expose their massive fraud/deception.
In Tim Ball’s own words, “Agenda 21 was the overall environmental plan of the United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP). It makes claims not supported by the evidence as an excuse to impose a world government.”
Maurice Strong died in Communist China in 2015 after being caught in a million dollar “Oil for Food” UN scandal in which he expropriated funds and was forced to flee Western society. He was accepted into China because his sister had enjoyed an intimate relationship with Chairman Mao. His name still appears on the Canadian Privy Council list.
What is truly shocking are the numbers of Canadians who have never heard about UN Agenda 21 or 2030, the fact that it was the CPC who signed Canada on to these destructive programs, or that ALL the mainstream political parties in Canada are supporting the destruction of our sovereignty using our tax dollars.
National Citizens Alliance is the only political party in Canada that is disseminating the truth. Please share this information with everyone in your social media network and support NCA in its mission to return Canada to a self-directed, self-sufficient country. This requires all of us working together to unite Canada.
For those who still have faith in the carbon dioxide/climate change theory consider that Canada’s Boreal Forest absorbs more CO2 than Canada will ever produce in the next 1000 years.
In order to be considered for National Citizens Alliance (NCA) candidacy you must be a Canadian Citizen at least 18 years of age and become a registered party member (see “Membership” tab on the main page).
NCA candidates are not “career politicians” looking to become part of the traditional Globalist establishment that already exists in Ottawa. NCA defies the conventional notions of “left” and “right” and is instead focussed on the distinction of working towards the best interests of Canada and its citizens as a sovereign nation. We are not empty suits. In fact we don’t wear suits at all: we do not identify with the crony corporate status quo.
We are a true grassroots Populist/Nationalist Canadian political party.
NCA is looking for people who want to make a difference and are willing to commit to serving others before themselves. Our policies have been created and established by our membership, this is not a “top-down” hierarchy. But you will be required to learn NCA’s policies and be able to discuss them with constituents in a fluid manner and to participate in debates. You must like meeting new people and be able to see yourself as a teacher and leader. You do not need to have a university degree but you do need to be willing to learn and grow with the party. You need to be computer literate and be able to participate in social media. You also need to have a certain degree of financial stability and be able to take time off work when necessary in order to run your campaign and your own candidate fundraising events.
All NCA candidates are screened by members of our Executive Board including our Leader, Stephen J. Garvey.
If you are interested in becoming an NCA candidate go to the “Candidate” tab and fill in the form. You will be contacted in due course to set up a time and date for your initial interview.
National Citizens Alliance looks forward to working with and for all Canadians in the upcoming Federal 2019 Election!
The sad reality of Canadian politics is that few people actually spend any time researching the people and parties at play in Canada’s political scene and instead rely on distorted mainstream media editorials for their information.
Fortunately there are still independent researchers and journalists who do spend time delving into little known facts or remind us of forgotten ones. And despite pretensions to the contrary, our mainstream political parties have been much less transparent about what’s been going on than most of us have realized. But it’s not uncommon for people to deny the facts when presented either.
The author who created this media clip and accompanying article about “Mad Max” praising the people’s “freedoms” in Communist China in 2016 while he was still a Conservative MP is such a revelation. But it’s not all that surprising since he is still a fan of Globalist “free trade” deals such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership. (By the way, the only thing “free” about it is the free ride corporations obtain in being able to bypass Canada’s judicial system and get a hearing in a special courtroom where the public is banned.)
“China is … rife with state economic interference, state-owned ‘companies’, corruption, crony capitalism, and failure of the rule of law.” Fred McMahon, Fraser Institute.
Max is in good company with his pal, Justin Trudeau, who recently echoed similar sentiments about the People’s Republic of China, coincidentally run by the People’s Party of China — another People’s Party that is anything but Populist.
In 2006 ” the HRSDC (Human Resources and Social Development Canada) and SSHRC (Social Studies Humanities Research Council) were governed under the Minister of Industry, who was Maxime Berrnier. On March 2006, he published a review of the SSHRC praising the merits of the social economy.” Social economy is a euphemism for Communism.
“Johanne Mennie, then Deputy Director of HRSDC & SSHRC, and the current Director of the People’s Party of Canada (PPC), attended several meetings with the George Soros-funded Tides Foundation of Canada that directly called for government policy interventions to implement the social economy program. One such meeting was on October 19-20, 2006 and was called “Scaling Up the Canadian Social Finance Sector”.
Attendees also included Edward Jackson, supported by the Desmarais Power Corporation, the World Bank, advisor to the Rockefeller Foundation, and Tim Brodhead, who is a mentor for the Trudeau Foundation.” (Source: https://cinetworknews.wordpress.com/2019/02/20/soros-tides-foundation-and-the-ppc/ Read this article for the full historical background.)
The Rockefeller Foundation was instrumental in setting up the United Nations and even purchased the land in New York City for its headquarters. The World Bank is an arm of the United Nations. Bernier got his start in business at the Power Corporation.
The social economy program is a key Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) of UN Agenda 2030.
If you were to tell your friends that you only wanted to have 2 children instead of 10 do you suppose they would accuse you of hating children? Probably not. They would likely acknowledge that you could only afford to raise 2 children and that it made sense given your financial circumstances.
So why is it then that when it’s suggested that Canada cut back on immigration numbers it is almost immediately rebuffed these days as someone “hating immigrants”?
“The Angus Reid Institute found 49 per cent of surveyed Canadians want to see the federal government’s 2018 target of 310,000 immigrants reduced. In 2014, 36 per cent said it should be reduced.”(Source: CBC)
But this is predicated on government being transparent about numbers. In an earlier poll from 2014 “When asked the question, during Citizenship and Immigration Canada’s 2013-14 annual tracking survey, 43 per cent of the Canadian adults polled wouldn’t even hazard a guess (about actual numbers). Fully one third thought the number was less than 100,000 a year… In the 1980s, when Canada was only admitting about 150,000 immigrants and refugees a year, significant proportions of Canadians were in favour of reducing the number.” (Source: Ottawa Citizen)
So what’s been happening?
“One of the key factors is that we’ve always made an economic case for immigration. People really buy into it.” according to a University of Ottawa political scientist Luc Turgeon who was quoted in 2014.
Do Canadians really know what they’re “buying into”?
According to a Statistics Canada Population Projections report from 2015 “For most of the 20th century, natural increase was the main driver of population growth in Canada. However, in the middle of the 1990s, a shift occurred when immigration increased while fertility remained relatively unchanged. As a result, migratory increase (the balance of immigration minus emigration) has been the main source of population growth in Canada for the last two decades. In 2012/2013, migratory increase accounted for just over two‑thirds of population growth (67.7%) while natural increase accounted for the remaining 32.3% of growth.” (https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/91-520-x/2014001/section02-eng.htm)
What happened to the “declining fertility rate” that we’ve been assailed with for the past number of years? It says “fertility remained relatively unchanged.” Immigration rates have certainly been growing, but the correlation to any notion that this is “necessary” to offset some decline in fertility is a myth.
Another interesting fact that one can glean from this population projection report is that the population of Canada was expected to hit 40 million in 2063. Canada’s current population, thanks to record high mass immigration in the past few years has already pushed it to nearly 38 million!
The statistics in this table (which draws on UN and World Bank input!) are completely out of sync with the present reality when it appears that Canada is presently experiencing a population explosion.
I think we need to ask some very hard questions about why the United Nations and World Bank are so focussed on our country’s demographics and the role of the UN in massively boosting our immigration rates without having any responsibility for the consequences in terms of of the cost to taxpayers (currently in excess of $40 billion per year) or the societal impact.
In 1967, Canada’s Centennial Year, the population was around 20 million. It took another 43 years (2010) to add another 10 million. Canada’s population has grown by another 8 million in only 9 years!
According to the Conference Board of Canada, job growth in the 1970’s-80’s averaged 3.4% a year. In 2000 it dropped to 1.6%. (https://www.conferenceboard.ca/hcp/Details/Economy/employment-growth.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1)
“In the 1970s and 1980s, Canada earned an “A” for employment growth, yet simultaneously received a “D” and a “C” for unemployment. The paradox of high employment growth and poor unemployment performance can be explained by the rapid increase in Canada’s labour force participation rate in those decades. This was driven by a shift in the demographic as baby boomers entered the labour force, increased participation by women, and higher levels of immigration.”
How intelligent is it, when unemployment levels are high due to known local factors, to bring in even more people seeking employment?
If you take the time to actually read through the Conference Board article it praises high immigration as contributing positively to the economy (!) because GDP increased — corporate Canada was having a field day. Canadians not so much….
Another thing we need to take into perspective is something called “per capita income”. “Income per capita is the most frequently used statistic for comparing economic well-being across countries. It is calculated as gross domestic product (GDP) per capita—it is not a measure of personal income.”
So let’s look at personal incomes in Canada, because it’s becoming increasingly apparent that GDP and per capita income are not going to tell us anything that is relevant to the people who actually live and work in Canada — they’re measures of how the Globalist corporate elites are doing milking the national labour cow.
“Nearly three-fifths of low-income neighbourhoods are in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver. But some smaller cities are also seeing high levels of poverty – Sherbrooke has the highest portion of its low-income population living in poor neighbourhoods, followed by Windsor and Trois-Rivières.
Single people, visible minorities, recent immigrants and single parents account for higher shares of the population inside poorer neighbourhoods. For instance, four in 10 people in low-income areas are visible minorities while in other neighbourhoods their share is 24.2 per cent.” (Source: Globe & Mail) The median individual income in Canada was $29,878 in 2010, the survey showed – which means half the population had an income above that level and half below. The median family income in Canada is $76,000.”
However the statisticians never substantiate how that “median family income” is arrived at or the fact that the majority of Canadians aren’t living in families.
The last Stats Can report showed that less than 30% of Canadians are living in family settings. That means that around 70% of Canadians are earning under $30,000 a year which should be declared the new poverty level. Strangely there is never any mention of single Canadians struggling to make ends meet, the entire media narrative is always about “families”.
In the meantime the Canadian government continues to not only lie about the benefits of mass immigration to Native Canadians, it also lies to potential new immigrants about the benefits of moving to Canada. Everybody is losing in the UN gambit except for multinational Globalist corporations.